Tsybovsky Y, Shubenok DV, Kravchuk ZI, Martsev SP.
(2007)
Protein Eng Des Sel.,
20,
481-490 |
Folding |
C-terminal hexahistidine tag |
Protein recombinantly expressed as and refolded from inclusion bodies. |
Escherichia coli |
BL21(DE3)pLysS |
37.0 |
3 h |
pETVL |
Purification of the VL domain
Expression of the VL domain was performed as we described earlier (Martsev et al., 2000). Inclusion bodies, which contained the major (95%) fraction of the recombinant protein, were separated from the soluble fraction of the cell lysate by centrifugation for 30 min at 35 000 g.
|
IPTG |
OD n/a =
n/a |
Sonication |
None |
Metal affinity chromatography |
insoluble |
Dialysis |
150-200 mL of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 0.15 M NaCl and 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) |
6 M guanidine hydrochloride (Gdn–HCl) |
5, 3 and 1 M urea in 0.1 M Tris, pH 8.1, or 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7 and, finally, against 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4 |
Metal affinity chromatography |
no |
7.4 |
25.0 |
n/a |
n/a |
None |
n/a |
To obtain the VL-2 conformer, we applied the refolding protocol-2 (Fig. 1, bottom line). For this, the VL domain after the Ni2+-NTA chromatography was dialyzed against 5, 3 and 1 M urea in 0.1 M Tris, pH 8.1, or 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7 and, finally, against 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, without the denaturant. |
Unspecified |
None |
None |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
In this paper, we provide the first description of the two stable and functional conformations of an antibody domain The key difference between the protocols is exposure to low pH (pH 2–3) in refolding protocol-1, which was critical to obtain the conformation denoted as VL-1. When exposure to the low pH was excluded from the procedure to give the refolding protocol-2, the stepwise dialysis at near-neutral pH yielded the conformer VL-2 |